Copyright Law vs. Public Court Documents
Sources:By
Peter S. Vogel
E-Commerce Times
04/11/12 5:00 AM PT
E-Commerce Times
04/11/12 5:00 AM PT
The public court system appears to have an implied right
to distribute papers filed in lawsuits, related to those suits. Probably even
the opposing parties in lawsuits have the right to make copies to provide as
exhibits to papers filed in response, and to share with clients and expert
witnesses. The question is, do commercial businesses have the right to copy
documents filed in court and share these documents for commercial gain? That
question may soon be answered.
In
the aftermath of the Watergate scandal in the 1970s, state and federal
governments moved to become more open, and the Internet has made the
achievement of transparency even easier.
Information
is now available to the general public on government websites or from federal
agencies in response to requests made under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA). Many states have open records laws (like the Texas Public Information Act )
requiring a similar provision of information on the state level.
Court Filings Are Public Documents
Lawyers
file documents electronically in most federal courts using a system known as PACER,
and in many state courts using a variety of systems. In Texas, for example, an eFiling System was instituted by the Texas Supreme Court Judicial
Committee on Information Technology (of which I was the founding
Chair, and continued in that role for 12 years).
As
a result, the federal and state courts (and clerks of courts) maintain
electronic copies of those pleadings. Under our open government, anyone can get
a copy -- if not filed under seal for confidential reasons -- for some nominal
fee, or for free. Interestingly, the author of the legal filing does not
control access to the filing or the distribution of copies.
How Does the Copyright Act Protect Authors of Legal Documents?
The
1976 U.S. Copyright Act predates the advent of widespread use of the Internet
and social media, and Internet-based copyright infringements. In 1998, Congress
passed the Digital Millennium Copyright Act
(DMCA), but most of the cases dealing with the DMCA are copyright
infringements arising from YouTube, music, movies and the like.
Yet
under the Copyright Act, the moment the author
creates a work, it is deemed protected by copyright without any further action
by the author. Unless the author assigns his or her rights to another, the
author retains the copyright.
When
lawyers draft pleadings and briefs, they clearly appear to be the authors under
the Copyright Act. Merely filing the papers in court does not appear to deprive
them of their copyright.
The
public court system appears to have an implied right to distribute papers filed
in lawsuits, related to those suits. Probably even the opposing parties in
lawsuits have the right to make copies to provide as exhibits to papers filed
in response, and to share with clients and expert witnesses.
The
question is, do commercial businesses have the right to copy documents filed in
court and share these documents for commercial gain? That question may soon be
answered.
Class Action Lawsuit Against West and LexisNexis
Two
lawyers filed a class action suit against West and LexisNexis for violating the
copyrights of authors of court filings. The lawsuit filed in Federal Court
in New York City on Feb. 22, 2012 by Edward White (of Oklahoma City)
and Kenneth Elan (of New York) starts with a description of the case:
"This
is a copyright infringement action against West and LexisNexis based upon their
unabashed wholesale copying of thousands of copyright-protected works, created
by, and owned by, the attorneys and law firms who authored them."
White
and Elan also allege that
"West
and LexisNexis have engaged in wholesale unlawful copying of attorneys'
copyrighted work, bundled those works into searchable databases, and sold
access to those works in the form of digitized text and images for huge
profits...."
Is
this case appropriate for a Class Action?
The
first step in this lawsuit will be for the Federal Court to establish whether
White and Elan can actually claim a class of plaintiffs for this case. White
and Elan seek court certification of a class that includes
"...all
attorneys and law firms ... that authored works ... that are contained in the
Defendants searchable databases.
If
the U.S. District Court certifies the class, the lawsuit can proceed.
Can West and LexisNexis Rely on Their User Contracts?
The
West (owned by Thomson Reuters) Terms of Service (ToS)
grants its users a license to the content of materials, but there are limits
found in West's Public Records Privacy Statement
that
"All
data in the WestlawNext, Westlaw Classic, and CLEAR (Consolidated Lead
Evaluation and Reporting) public records databases are supplied by government
agencies and reputable private suppliers.
Further,
West defines Public Records, Nonpublic Information, and Publicly available
information, and also has a Notice of Copyright and Trademarks that
states that "MATERIALS IN THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED 'AS IS' WITHOUT
WARRANTY OF ANY KIND." So in plain English, West users have no promise
that West has the right to the content at all.
The
LexisNexis (a division of Reed Elsevier) ToS
are much like those of West. LexisNexis also has a separate Statement Regarding Copying,
Downloading and Distribution Of Materials From The Lexisnexis® Services,
which includes specific provisions dealing with whether the "fair
use" provision of the Copyright Act may apply.
But
is indexing and making copies of such works actually "fair use"? Fair
use applies when a copyrighted work is used for certain noncommercial purposes,
such as in a research paper or in giving a lecture at a university.
Soon
after White and Elan filed their lawsuit, Don Cruse, in his Supreme
Court of Texas Blog, shared a thoughtful opinion on why he does not
support White and Elan's position on policy grounds, and he offered to opt out
of a class action. He suggests this case probably will turn on the question of
fair use.
Some Conclusions
This
lawsuit, if fully adjudicated, may result in judicial or subsequent legislative
redefining of public documents, at least as filed in courts.
Of
course, there is a long way to go. If the court does not certify a class, each
individual author will need to separately sue West and LexisNexis and other
services, even if White and Elan win on their copyright infringement claims.